Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Anatomical or mirror mode imitation? A behavioral approach.

C. Pierpaoli, L. Ferrante, T. Manzoni, M. Fabri


Imitation can occur in at least two forms: one, which can be defined as anatomical, is based primarily on the mental construct of the body schema and allows recognition of correspondences between own body anatomy and that of other individuals. The other form, defined as specular or mirror mode, is most probably based on the allocation of some form of attention to the same region of the environmental space both by model and imitator, and to the objects it contains. This study investigated the behavioral strategy of imitation in normal subjects, to assess whether they carried out task instructions using an anatomical or a mirror perspective. Twenty seven adults were asked to imitate intransitive meaningful and meaningless gestures shown by a model in video clips. Instructions about how to perform them were provided before each trial. Trials were free (intended to produce spontaneous imitation) or driven (intended to produce anatomical imitation); further driven trials were administered to verify participants’ knowledge of bodily laterality and were used as control. Performances were interpreted as anatomical or mirror imitation, according to the observation of anatomical or spatial reference frames between stimulus and imitator. The results revealed that in spontaneous imitation the mirror mode was more frequent (61% of responses), in line with previous studies. The novel finding was the prevalence (93% of responses) of anatomical imitation in tasks involving detailed driven instructions.


Imitation; Anatomical perspective; Mirror perspective; Intransitive gestures

Full Text:



Anquetil T. and Jeannerod M. Simulated actions in the first and in the third person perspectives share common representations. Brain Res., 1130(1): 125-129, 2007.

Avikainen S., Wohlschläger A., Liuhanen S., Hänninen R., Hari R. Impaired mirror-image imitation in Asperger and high-functioning autistic subjects. Curr. Biol., 13: 339-341, 2003.

Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A., 53(1): 153-164, 2000.

Bjasch D., Bockisch C.J., Straumann D., Tarnutzer A.A. Differential effects of visual feedback on subjective visual vertical accuracy and precision. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11): e49311.

Carmo J.C. and Rumiati R.I. Imitation of transitive and intransitive actions in healthy individuals. Brain Cogn., 69(3): 460-464, 2009.

Casasanto D. Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 138(3): 351-367, 2009.

Collett D. 2003. Modelling Binary Data, Capman Hall, London, CRC.

Conson M., Aromino A.R., Trojano L. Whose hand is this? Handedness and visual perspective modulate self/other discrimination. Exp. Brain Res., 206(4): 449-453, 2010.

Crescentini C., Mengotti P., Grecucci A., Rumiati R.I. The effect of observed biological and non biological movements on action imitation: an fMRI study. Brain Res., 1420: 80-92, 2011.

Development Core Team. 2008. A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.

Franz E. A., Ford S.,Werner S. Brain and cognitive processes of imitation in bimanual situations: Making inferences about mirror neuron systems. Brain Res., 1145: 138-149, 2007.

Gardner M.R. and Potts R. Domain general mechanism account for imagined transformations of whole body perspective. Acta Psychologica, 137(3): 371-381, 2011.

Gentilucci M., Daprati E., Gangitano M. Implicit visual analysis in handedness recognition. Conscious Cogn., 7(3): 478-493, 1998.

Gleissner B., Meltzoff A.N., Bekkering H. Children’s coding of human action: cognitive factors influencing imitation in 3-year-olds. Dev. Sci., 3: 405-414, 2000.

Gordon H. Hand and ear tests. Brit. J. Psychol., 13(3): 283-300, 1923.

Head, H. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Brain, 43:87-165, 1920.

Heyes C., Ray E. Spatial S-R compatibility effects in an intentional imitation task. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 11(4): 703-708, 2004.

Iacoboni M., Koski L.M., Brass M., Bekkering H., Woods R.P., Dubeau M.C., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 98(24): 13995-13999, 2001.

Ionta S. and Blanke O. Differential influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet in left and right handers. Exp. Brain Res., 195(2): 207-217, 2009.

Ishikura T. and Inomata K. Effects of angle of model-demonstration on learning of motor skill. Percept. Mot. Skills, 80: 651-658, 1995.

Jackson P.L., Meltzoff A.N., Decety J. Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage, 31(1): 429-439, 2006.

Jeannerod, M. Being oneself. J. Physiol. Paris, 101: 161-168, 2007.

Kitada R., Dijkerman H.C., Soo G., Lederman S.J. Representing human hands haptically or visually from first-person versus third-person perspectives. Perception, 39(2): 236-254. 2010.

Koski L., Iacoboni M., Dubeau M.C., Woods R.P., Mazziotta J.C. Modulation of

cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. J Neurophysiol, 89(1): 460-471, 2003.

Kosslyn S.M., DiGirolamo G.J., Thompson WL., Alpert N.M. Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology, 35(2): 151-161, 1998.

Krause D. and Kobow S. Effects of model orientation on the visuomotor imitation of arm movements: The role of mental rotation. Hum. Mov. Sci., 32(2): 314-327, 2013.

Lausberg H. and Cruz R.F. Hemispheric specialisation for imitation of hand-head positions and finger configurations: a controlled study in patients with complete callosotomy. Neuropsychologia, 42(3): 320-334, 2004.

May M. and Wendt M. Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task. Cogn. Process., 13(1): 257-260. 2012.

Meltzoff A.N. ‘Like me’: a foundation for social cognition. Dev. Sci., 10(1): 126-134, 2007.

Meltzoff A.N. and Decety J. What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B., 358(1431): 491-500, 2003.

Meltzoff A.N. and Moore M.K. Imitation of facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates. Science, 198(4312): 75-78, 1977.

Meltzoff A.N. and Moore M.K. Newborn Infants Imitate Adult Facial Gestures. Child Devel., 54: 702-709, 1983.

Meltzoff A.N. and Moore M.K. Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Dev. Parent., 6: 179-192, 1997.

Mühlau M., Hermsdörfer J., Goldenberg G., Wohlschläger A.M., Castrop F., Stahl R., Röttinger M., Erhard P., Haslinger B., Ceballos-Baumann A.O., Conrad B., Boecker H., Left inferior parietal dominance in gesture imitation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 43(7): 1086-1098, 2005.

Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1): 97-113, 1971.

Parsons L.M. Visual discrimination of abstract mirror-reflected three-dimensional objects at many orientations. Percept Psychophys., 42(1): 49-59, 1987.

Parsons L.M. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 20(4):709-730, 1994.

Parsons L.M., Fox PT., Downs J.H., Glass T., Hirsch T.B., Martin C.C., Jerabek P.A., Lancaster J.L. Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375(6526): 54-58, 1995.

Press C., Ray E., Heyes C. Imitation of lateralized body movements: doing it the hard way. Laterality, 14(5): 515-527, 2009.

Rumiati R.I. and Tessari A. Imitation of novel and well-known actions: the role of short-term memory. Exp. Brain Res., 142(3): 425-433, 2002.

Sambrook T.D. Does visual perspective matter in imitation? Perception, 27(12): 1461-1473, 1998.

Shepard R.N. and Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972): 701-703, 1971.

Shofield W.N. Do children find movements which cross the body midline difficult? Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 28(4): 571-582, 1976.

Stürmer B., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 26(6): 1746-1759, 2000.

Sudo T., Heari T., Mogi K. Egocentric mental transformation of self: effects of spatial relationship in mirror-image and anatomic imitations. Exp. Brain Res., 221(1): 27-32, 2012.

Wapner S. and Cirillo L. Imitation of a model’s hand movements: age changes in transposition of left-right relations. Child Dev., 39(3): 887-894, 1968.

Wexler M., Kosslyn S. M., Berthoz A. Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition 68: 77-94, 1998.

Willems R.M., Toni I., Hagoort P., Casasanto D. Body specific motor imagery of hand actions: neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychol. Sci.,21(1): 67-74, 2010.

Wohlschläger A. and Bekkering H. Is human imitation based on a mirror-neuron system? Some behavioural evidence. Exp. Brain Res., 143(3): 335-341, 2002.



  • There are currently no refbacks.